What I do when I should be studying...or not taking part in a Reality Television show
Who needs enemies...
Published on May 29, 2004 By notsohighlyevolved In Politics
Australians love bagging Americans. This is not an opinion but a fact that has been ascertained by having to sit through countless conversations where the generic American has been the subject. More often than not Shakespeare’s Richard the Third has been treated more kindly than this American that is just as fictitious as the hunch-backed despot.

Why is it that Americans inspire such animosity, what in many cases is constituted of a envious respect and a persistent annoyance? The Columbine shootings are exemplary of why the Americans are considered to be such idiosyncratic creatures. Since they are at the helm of the biggest economy they feel it necessary to shoot each other in prodigious numbers. News reports from the States are conflicted in that they sound like they are the products of both a highly developed, affluent Western country and a newly emerged central African war zone. Children shooting children! Really? How barbaric. We cannot understand how such things happen although we are starting to get a taste of it in our suburbs.

There is one thing that can be said about American teenagers. They are an ambitious lot. When they set out to do something they really do it. This could be seen to be an appalling remark given that thirteen people lost their lives and twenty-one were injured that august day. The event was also a violent expression of the disaffection and disenfranchisement that plagues and, at times, drives American youths. Columbine is a reference point used when trying to come to grips with modern American culture and where we as Australians stand in relation to it. It is in our choosing of references such as Columbine that leads us to have throw an American on the Barbie days rather than viewing objectively the people of one our most important allies and greatest cultural influences.

We cannot understand why the Americans went to war in Vietnam (even though we leave unquestioned why we went with them), we do not understand why one in five American high school boys have at one time taken a weapon to school, we do not understand why American films that, supposedly are barren wastelands bare of script, talent or message dominate the local cinemaplexes; we do not understand why a country which is sold as the world’s democratic leading light witnessed the Kennedy brothers assassinated with the accompanying gunfire crescendo of Martin Luther King’s death. We do not understand how two boys can walk into a school and kill thirteen people within 16 min and have failed what was their original mission – to kill everyone in that school and those who came to help them. This is a chilling portrait of barbarism and it should be interpreted as such but we, along with the Europeans and most of the third world have a habit of taking it to the illogical conclusion that all Americans are evil, if not explicitly than at least tacitly.

We do not understand so we do what all good Christians, Muslims, Atheists, agnostics, liberals and communists do when they do not understand something… we bash it. The American has become the mythical, if not actual, victim. We kill a million American’s a day. That is if tongues could kill.

And who is it that leads this lynch mob against the new imperials? Well, I’ll be damned. It’s those Americans. Even when it comes to the great, global critique of the American way the bastards have done it again and imperialised it. Conquered it wholesale. There is nothing more pathetic than an idiot in a huff expecting a fight, only to find their opponent actually agreeing with them. This has happened to us time and time again and it is not that we are beaten to the starting line, it is just that our voices are so meek and the American voice is so very loud when it is booming with victory or harping with self-criticism.

Let us take Michael Moore for instance. This is a man that has made a profession of America basing. We have a stupid white man screaming at other stupid white men and any other men/women of any other race, colour or greed have very little chance of getting their two cents in. Those sixteen minutes that blasted a community apart, that required a reappraisal of innocence and the age at which it is lost, was turned into an Oscar winning tirade by Moore through his Bowling for Columbine. We all know how loudly American cinema can speak, and Bowling for Columbine has nullified any foreign criticism that could be directed at American culture and society.

This is the, often unacknowledged, strength of America. It can head off international criticism in a way that other nations can’t. It has the loudest voice and the recent European verbal violence against the U.S.A was an isolated incident where the European nations used a global forum and the US media itself to propagate its message. The first thing you should do when you want to avoid an argument with someone who has a good one is to agree with them. American culture accomplishes this beautifully. There is an American web site called GeorgeWBushWhackers (www.georgewbushwhackers.com) started after the 2000 presidential elections. It has become obvious that no one on God’s green planet enjoys Bushwhacking more than those who apparently elected him. It is no small indication of America’s love affair with its own hatred that Moore’s book Stupid White Men was on the US best seller list for over a year.

It is time that Australians recognise America’s love affair with its own self-hatred and realise that whatever we have to add to the argument is redundant and superfluous. The chances of the Americans having said first whatever it is that we were about to insult them with is just too great to risk. A telling tale that exemplifies this is the Loser Turd Mafia.

Much was made of the two Columbine’s shooters association with the Trenchcoat Mafia, a group of social misfits who banded together in face of “popular” ostracisation. Pauline Colby, a former member of the Trenchcoat Mafia said, “They were just very angry, but they didn’t know how to release their anger.” The Loser Turd Mafia is also another collective of pissed off American high schoolers that highlight the dual nature of the American beast. They complain and criticise in a constructive manner that has lead to the growth of a global community rather than the local death of many.

The Loser Turd Mafia was started by a group Lawrenceburg High School students who were also outcasts sitting around a cafeteria table and discussing how they should respond to the Columbine shootings. This group of friends thought that the Trenchcoat Mafia and the Columbine shooting had “disgraced the loser title,” and that a voice should be provided for American youth who were pissed off and disenchanted but wanted to come together rather than pull apart. The web site that emerged from that discussion is hilarious and a glowing beacon for American optimism. If you look at photos of the two groups side by side, the Trenchcoat Mafia and the Loser Turd Mafia, they are fundamentally indistinguishable. It is in their responses to the same circumstances that set them apart and it is also this that shows most forcefully the dual nature of American society. It is a two headed monster with the two heads constantly snapping at the other complaining of the others ideology.

The US media network is awash with others just like Michael Moore, GeorgeWBushWhacker.com and the Loser Turd Mafia. One of America’s most famous, outspoken and intelligent critics is, surprisingly enough, another American, Noam Chomsky. Even after 9/11 Chomsky continued to lambast the American government for its foreign policy and cultural arrogance. He published a book titled 9/11 that argued the contextual reasons for the 9/11 attack. Undemocratically but understandably the book was criticised in the US which at the time was less interested in context than in retaliation.

The point however is that the Americans did not need us or anyone else telling them why such and such a thing had happened, or what it is that the Americans are once again doing wrong, they have that covered already, thankyou very much. For God’s sake! They have Noam Chomsky.

It is time that the ability that America possesses to self-analyse and self-criticise is taken into account whenever we decide to utter a sentence with the word “American” included. We might think that criticising the US is a quick and easy way of sounding intelligent, worldly and abreast of current and important affairs. Chances are the use of America and its doings in long angry rants are a sure way of saying something that has been said a million times before. To add insult to injury, on average 999,980 instances of that remark have probably been made by an American. Keep that in mind next time you take on a Californian accent to mimic a New England personality to insult a Texan president.

Disclaimer: This is not in defence of American impunity or imperialism.





Comments (Page 1)
5 Pages1 2 3  Last
on May 29, 2004
Absolutely brilliant Marco.

A group of my friends actually call Americans 'Seppo's' - this is because Americans are Yanks, and this rhymes with Septic Tanks... that's public opinion in Australia for you!

The monster certainly is two headed my friend, although, I fear one is getting bigger than the other at times!

BAM!!!
on May 29, 2004
in my short experience at ju, ive found your articles to be articulate, provocative (in the best sense of that term) and entertaining--and this is no exception. i must be missing something tho because im unable to determine why youve constructed it around the columbine shootings.
on May 29, 2004
i must be missing something tho because im unable to determine why youve constructed it around the columbine shootings.


I will interject and maybe my interpretation is correct eh Marco?

Kingbee - Australians use the Collumbine shootings as an example of how rotten American culture has become. Kid's taking guns to school is just not fathomable here in Australia.

We did have the Port Athur incident though - however, that was isolated, and in my opinion, questionable.

It's just Ammo we use for American bashing, pardon the pun.

BAM!!!
on May 29, 2004
Kingbee - Because of LTM (Loser Turd Mafia). Its a nice example to show how way one act gets refracted through the American psyche. I could have used many other examples, i just didn't. Who knows, i usually have the same difficulty, attempting to figure out why i wrote something the way i did, and i'm the one who wrote it.

Muggaz - i used to hear the word seppo a lot back in the day when i was a surfer. Being young and naive, i always assumed it was because American surfers had no choice but to surf next to sewerage pipes. Their beaches on surfing videos always looked densely populated and dirty.

Know i know better. Thanks.

Marco
on May 29, 2004
Muggaz comes to my defence. Should i swoon or something

And its true. Columbine is the one event that keeps on cropping up disproportionately in expositions of American culture. Especially when the lynch mob gets together and wants to hang some Americana.

Marco
on May 29, 2004
Muggaz comes to my defence. Should i swoon or something


hahaha... you are a wierdo.

thats what I like about you!

BAM!!!
on May 29, 2004
This was great and so true Marco.

I can't ever tease Thomas about America because he always beats me to it

Just to let you know ..it sucks. Where is the fun in knocking someones country when they do it better than you.

Although i still try

Jess
on May 29, 2004
Gothic - and those Americans are so damn loud. If we can do it better than them, we definitely can't do it louder than them.

Also, i gain very little pleasure in bashing the good ol' US. I only have to have a look in my own Australian backyard to find all that's debased and vile about the Screaming Eagle and its 50 stars.

Marco
on May 29, 2004
oohhh you asked for it now.

sits back with popcorn and watches Marco get stomped

This should be more entertaining than the American election hype

Jess

on May 29, 2004
More entertaining. Is it possible? Plausible even?

I look better as pulp anyway

Marco
on May 29, 2004
and those Americans are so damn loud

ive had very close friendships with aussies both on and offline. i doubt ill ever visit oz because im pretty sure id be dead in less than three weeks. im a rampant hedonist but yall party so fiercely id burn out tryin to keep up.

its interesting to me that columbine made such an impression there. none of the aussies i know have ever asked about or mentioned it in conversation. its unusual mainly because columbine was considered to be a good school in a good suburb. the guns part isnt nearly as bizarre as the kids being willing to jim jones themselves over something that would have stopped mattering in a year or two
on May 29, 2004
Kingbee - it's not something people idylly bring up in conversation, but when discussion turns to problems that are specific to America, specifically problems with violence, that tragedy comes to the fore.

For most other occurences of violence in the world, we can usually come up with some easy, cliched Socio-eco-political reasons to trace back to initial conditions or causes.

For Columbine we couldn't. It wasn't easy figuring out why kids who went to a good school, in a good suburb decided to kill and maime, all for (speculated) reasons that could have been overcome in a couple of years.

Most of the reasoning lead us back to the media, particularly American media, which got a lot of people questioning whether there was something worng with the way America represented itself and its values.

It becomes a good example when we ask the question - do Western cultural norms (i.e. American norms) represent violence as the simplest, most effective way of dealing with problems? I don't plan on asking or answering that question, but viewing the current global climate, it seems a lot of people are thinking and acting assumption that violence is the best answer.

I guess Columbine was an event that was affective as they come.

Kids killing kids for reasons we can't easily ascertain or understand.

It resonated the world over.

Marco
on May 29, 2004
i think i gotcha now--at least part way..

every decade i can remember theres been some sort of anomaly like that. in the 50s, the media take seemed to indicate kids didnt do that kinda stuff before then. you may be familiar with the first waves of 'juvenile delinquents gone wild' books and films (amboy dukes, blackboard jungle, rebel without a cause, westside story, another flick with richard widmark battling a three-person gang one of whom thought he was batman, etc.). most of those were based on true stories and the message was always something like whats wrong with todays kids. ive seen brit and aussie flicks themed the same way.

the reason im calling it an anomaly is this: in the 10 years prior to columbine, there were at least 4 well-publicized incidents in which kids in brought guns to school and held court in the aisles--the two i remember clearest involved love triangles. but there were also several that appeared to have their roots in metal music and sophmoric satanism.

im not so sure theres much of a difference between leopold & loeb in the 30s and the columbine kids in the 90s.

kids do stupid things. there are dozens of people who are walkin around bent outta shape over their failed predictions that i wouldnt make it to 20 alive and/or out of prison. if id been pushed a little harder when i was 15, they might have been right.

ill be the first to agree that its not always easy to see ones flaws without some help from others holding mirrors but im thinking that as far as diagnosing the pathology of national character you need something a bit more nationwide and chronic--like the soccer hooligans.
on May 29, 2004

Interesting article.

Couple of other things: The POW scandal was identified first by the US military internally and reported publicly by the US military in January. The pictures from the scandal were first shown to the public by the American media (60 minutes).

The US didn't get caught with its pants down. The US's pants fell down and it went around with a bullhorn saying "Hey, look, my pants are down!"

on May 29, 2004
The story of 'the Trenchcoat Mafia' was picked up by the media struggling to explain these shootings, but it really doesn't carry much factual weight. The name refers to an informal group of Columbine seniors, already graduated by the time of the event, who were involved in feuds with the 'jocks'. Harris and Klebold were never part of any mysterious gang or conspiracy. Harris was a psychopath (by definition), and Klebold was a his enraged accomplice. The question then is why a psychopath in America should be driven to commit such great crimes, and I think we need to look at the way our media feeds us tragedies like the Oklahoma City bombing and the Branch Davidians assault, all the way back to the mythic criminals of the West and fictionalized outlaws such as Bonnie and Clyde, creating a national dialogue of sensationalized crime. In a twisted sense, Americans coldly anticipate the next big event because the media provides us with such a rush with its instant coverage and 'Special Reports'. In a sense, the media is its own psychopath, unreceptive to human suffering and itching to exploit it for news, the more catastraphic the better. I don't think Harris really hated anyone in particular at Columbine; I think he was trying to create a story, to participate in this dialogue, to enact the story of Bonnie and Clyde once again, and be yet another anti-hero for the American consumer. The victims were immaterial, a number sum that was to be maximized if his story was to succeed. If Harris had the resources and brains, and a little more insanity, he would have gladly acted on an earlier childhood fantasy: hijacking a plane and crashing it into New York City - apparently the archetypical image of the great American terrorist act before and after 9/11.
5 Pages1 2 3  Last