What I do when I should be studying...or not taking part in a Reality Television show
Who needs enemies...
Published on May 29, 2004 By notsohighlyevolved In Politics
Australians love bagging Americans. This is not an opinion but a fact that has been ascertained by having to sit through countless conversations where the generic American has been the subject. More often than not Shakespeare’s Richard the Third has been treated more kindly than this American that is just as fictitious as the hunch-backed despot.

Why is it that Americans inspire such animosity, what in many cases is constituted of a envious respect and a persistent annoyance? The Columbine shootings are exemplary of why the Americans are considered to be such idiosyncratic creatures. Since they are at the helm of the biggest economy they feel it necessary to shoot each other in prodigious numbers. News reports from the States are conflicted in that they sound like they are the products of both a highly developed, affluent Western country and a newly emerged central African war zone. Children shooting children! Really? How barbaric. We cannot understand how such things happen although we are starting to get a taste of it in our suburbs.

There is one thing that can be said about American teenagers. They are an ambitious lot. When they set out to do something they really do it. This could be seen to be an appalling remark given that thirteen people lost their lives and twenty-one were injured that august day. The event was also a violent expression of the disaffection and disenfranchisement that plagues and, at times, drives American youths. Columbine is a reference point used when trying to come to grips with modern American culture and where we as Australians stand in relation to it. It is in our choosing of references such as Columbine that leads us to have throw an American on the Barbie days rather than viewing objectively the people of one our most important allies and greatest cultural influences.

We cannot understand why the Americans went to war in Vietnam (even though we leave unquestioned why we went with them), we do not understand why one in five American high school boys have at one time taken a weapon to school, we do not understand why American films that, supposedly are barren wastelands bare of script, talent or message dominate the local cinemaplexes; we do not understand why a country which is sold as the world’s democratic leading light witnessed the Kennedy brothers assassinated with the accompanying gunfire crescendo of Martin Luther King’s death. We do not understand how two boys can walk into a school and kill thirteen people within 16 min and have failed what was their original mission – to kill everyone in that school and those who came to help them. This is a chilling portrait of barbarism and it should be interpreted as such but we, along with the Europeans and most of the third world have a habit of taking it to the illogical conclusion that all Americans are evil, if not explicitly than at least tacitly.

We do not understand so we do what all good Christians, Muslims, Atheists, agnostics, liberals and communists do when they do not understand something… we bash it. The American has become the mythical, if not actual, victim. We kill a million American’s a day. That is if tongues could kill.

And who is it that leads this lynch mob against the new imperials? Well, I’ll be damned. It’s those Americans. Even when it comes to the great, global critique of the American way the bastards have done it again and imperialised it. Conquered it wholesale. There is nothing more pathetic than an idiot in a huff expecting a fight, only to find their opponent actually agreeing with them. This has happened to us time and time again and it is not that we are beaten to the starting line, it is just that our voices are so meek and the American voice is so very loud when it is booming with victory or harping with self-criticism.

Let us take Michael Moore for instance. This is a man that has made a profession of America basing. We have a stupid white man screaming at other stupid white men and any other men/women of any other race, colour or greed have very little chance of getting their two cents in. Those sixteen minutes that blasted a community apart, that required a reappraisal of innocence and the age at which it is lost, was turned into an Oscar winning tirade by Moore through his Bowling for Columbine. We all know how loudly American cinema can speak, and Bowling for Columbine has nullified any foreign criticism that could be directed at American culture and society.

This is the, often unacknowledged, strength of America. It can head off international criticism in a way that other nations can’t. It has the loudest voice and the recent European verbal violence against the U.S.A was an isolated incident where the European nations used a global forum and the US media itself to propagate its message. The first thing you should do when you want to avoid an argument with someone who has a good one is to agree with them. American culture accomplishes this beautifully. There is an American web site called GeorgeWBushWhackers (www.georgewbushwhackers.com) started after the 2000 presidential elections. It has become obvious that no one on God’s green planet enjoys Bushwhacking more than those who apparently elected him. It is no small indication of America’s love affair with its own hatred that Moore’s book Stupid White Men was on the US best seller list for over a year.

It is time that Australians recognise America’s love affair with its own self-hatred and realise that whatever we have to add to the argument is redundant and superfluous. The chances of the Americans having said first whatever it is that we were about to insult them with is just too great to risk. A telling tale that exemplifies this is the Loser Turd Mafia.

Much was made of the two Columbine’s shooters association with the Trenchcoat Mafia, a group of social misfits who banded together in face of “popular” ostracisation. Pauline Colby, a former member of the Trenchcoat Mafia said, “They were just very angry, but they didn’t know how to release their anger.” The Loser Turd Mafia is also another collective of pissed off American high schoolers that highlight the dual nature of the American beast. They complain and criticise in a constructive manner that has lead to the growth of a global community rather than the local death of many.

The Loser Turd Mafia was started by a group Lawrenceburg High School students who were also outcasts sitting around a cafeteria table and discussing how they should respond to the Columbine shootings. This group of friends thought that the Trenchcoat Mafia and the Columbine shooting had “disgraced the loser title,” and that a voice should be provided for American youth who were pissed off and disenchanted but wanted to come together rather than pull apart. The web site that emerged from that discussion is hilarious and a glowing beacon for American optimism. If you look at photos of the two groups side by side, the Trenchcoat Mafia and the Loser Turd Mafia, they are fundamentally indistinguishable. It is in their responses to the same circumstances that set them apart and it is also this that shows most forcefully the dual nature of American society. It is a two headed monster with the two heads constantly snapping at the other complaining of the others ideology.

The US media network is awash with others just like Michael Moore, GeorgeWBushWhacker.com and the Loser Turd Mafia. One of America’s most famous, outspoken and intelligent critics is, surprisingly enough, another American, Noam Chomsky. Even after 9/11 Chomsky continued to lambast the American government for its foreign policy and cultural arrogance. He published a book titled 9/11 that argued the contextual reasons for the 9/11 attack. Undemocratically but understandably the book was criticised in the US which at the time was less interested in context than in retaliation.

The point however is that the Americans did not need us or anyone else telling them why such and such a thing had happened, or what it is that the Americans are once again doing wrong, they have that covered already, thankyou very much. For God’s sake! They have Noam Chomsky.

It is time that the ability that America possesses to self-analyse and self-criticise is taken into account whenever we decide to utter a sentence with the word “American” included. We might think that criticising the US is a quick and easy way of sounding intelligent, worldly and abreast of current and important affairs. Chances are the use of America and its doings in long angry rants are a sure way of saying something that has been said a million times before. To add insult to injury, on average 999,980 instances of that remark have probably been made by an American. Keep that in mind next time you take on a Californian accent to mimic a New England personality to insult a Texan president.

Disclaimer: This is not in defence of American impunity or imperialism.





Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Jun 02, 2004
the postcard bandit

my turn to be shocked and awed. to the best of my knowledge, weve never had anyone steal postcards (except perhaps professionals who 'found' a truckload that 'fell off a truck' someplace). is there much money in it?


nonmingusbeans!

on Jun 02, 2004
Through a precursory check, and I do mean, precursory, estimates range from 7,200,000 to 11,000,000 firearms in Canada(Link) With a population of approx 32,000,000, that's about 1 firearm for every three people at the highest estimates. That's a lot of guns. Like I said - easy access.

I also note that you guys sell guns in sporting goods stores. That's unheard of in Australia, or NSW anyway. ( I could be wrong here. I haven't travelled much through the regional centres of Australia, or NSWs for that matter. If i am, any Australians, let me know).

The point was that it isn't just access to guns that lead to a violent culture. There are a whole lot of other factors.

Marco

on Jun 02, 2004
following the link you provided, i see an estimate of 222,053 handguns for canada. the us estimates ive found so far arent expressed in numbers BUT percentage of households (jeez) like 29% of all us households.

there are a lot of hunters in canada which would explain the total number of firearms. 222k is a very small percentage of course

this data is over 10 years old and predates columbine but...

Handgun murders (1992) (22)

Handgun............1992 ..... Handgun Murder
Country ..........Murders........Population..................Rate (per 100,000)
-----------------------------------------------------------
United States.....13,429..... ..254,521,000...................5.28
Switzerland ................97........ ....6,828,023..................1.42
Canada.....................128 ...........27,351,509 .................0.47
Sweden.......................36................8,602,157............... 0.42
Australia .....................13...............17,576,354 .............. 0.07
United Kingdom 33 57,797,514 0.06
Japan 60 124,460,481 0.05

i was kidding about being shocked by postcard banditry. those figures are truly shocking if for no other reason than the ridiclous difference between the highest and next highest rankings.

dammit this table breaks up and im not sure if a table commands are available

heres a link to the page where i found these stats. scroll halfway down guns
on Jun 02, 2004
I would be wary of any conservative estimates for the number of firearms (I.e. not only handguns) in Canada. You have to keep in mind that up until 2003, only handguns and restricted weapons (e.g fully automatic, large capacity magazine capable, etc) needed to be registered. Up until that time, a licenced owner could buy as many weapons as they wanted without the state knowing exactly how many they had purchased. Link

Marco
on Jun 02, 2004
I have been assimilated. What else could explain this persistent drooling problem.

Marco
on Jun 02, 2004
Apparently in Japan the school children simply slit each other's throats. That culture too, has its dark underside.

Link

on Jun 02, 2004
Right, we can talk about this and that type of gun but, for all intents and purposes it's handguns that are the real killers. Submachine guns, etc., while deadly, just aren't used to kill all that many people (statistically speaking).

And Dad's old hunting gun, somewhere in the attic, might make it into the total count - but isn't really the killing machine that handguns are.

If KB's figures are correct (and I personally have only known one [1] Canadian in my 40+ years who's owned a handgun, so I'd tend to believe them), we have one handgun per 100-150 people. You folks have 1 per every 3 people. Actually, it's suprising your murder rates aren't even higher.

Having lived here, I'm not suprised at the low counts for handguns. However, that does seem to be changing in the younger ones, who are set on violence or gang activities. Thanks NRA! Thanks gun manufacturers! Nice legacy!
on Jun 02, 2004
@ Kingbee - actually I can't for the life of me remember why Brandon Abbot was called the Postcard bandit - I didn't watch the telemovie.

I think he was a bankrobber.... - I do know that he escped out of the David Longland jail and was on the run for a bit

- I had a friend who owned a gunshop in Armidale (northern NSW) - it burnt down
on Jun 02, 2004
sorry - I didn't notice when I posted that the comments had gone over the page
on Jun 02, 2004
actually I can't for the life of me remember why Brandon Abbot was called the Postcard bandit


He was called the postcard bandit because he sent postcards to the coppers

BAM!!!
on Jun 03, 2004
for all intents and purposes it's handguns that are the real killers.


Last time i checked, handguns didn't exhibit signs of intent or stand trial in court. I'm all for gun control. I think all of them should be banned and destroyed. I do not think that the killing will stop though. The killing would become less effecient. If i was a Canadian i would be proud of the people who seem to respect peace and don't kill each other at the drop of a dime, i would be proud of legislation as far as the people who formulated and enforce that legislation. There is nothing more inhuman than the law until it serves humanity.

Marco
on Jun 03, 2004
Please Marco don't get my comments caught up in some kind of semanic argument - of course people use them to kill - I could be more explicit (and windy), but I think everyone understood my intent with the comment that handguns are the real killers (NRA idiots notwithstanding) ...

As far as the killing stopping - no - but it certainly slows it down - it's so much messier to kill someone with a knife, etc.
on Jun 03, 2004
Its not a semantic argument. In Indonesia and the independence violence in East Timor, they don't care what type of weapon they use. Remember the images of men chasing down others with maschetes.

Guns are incidental. Its culture and politics. Whether a society and its culture and political institutions condone or abhor guns and condones or abhors their use of them, is more important than access to the guns, primarily because of precedence. If a culture and its political institutions condone them it will be much more likely that they will be easily available. Futhermore, if a culture and its political institutions sets an example in using these firearms as useful tools in problem solving and conflict management, then it is much more likely that guns (of whatever type) will be used in the only way you can use a gun - to kill things.

Marco
on Jun 05, 2004
I, too, belong to the loser turd mafia and i would like to say that i rather enjoy the criticisms of other countries, when they are founded in truth. It helps lend credence to those of us who do see whats wrong and voice our opinions about it, otherwise we would just be labeled unpatriotic.
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5